Emotional Intelligence
Goleman
|
Non-Cognitive
Aspects of Intelligence
Emotional Intelligence
(EI)
|
Robert Thorndike (1937)
David Wechsler (1940)
Howard Gardner (1983)
Salovey & Mayer (1990)
Daniel Goleman (1995) |
|
A bit of Emotional
Intelligence history
When psychologists began to write and
think about intelligence, they initially focused on cognitive aspects,
such as memory and problem-solving. However, there have been researchers
who recognized early on that the non-cognitive aspects were also
important:
-
Robert
Thorndike was writing about social intelligence in 1937,
-
David Wechsler
defined intelligence as the aggregate or global capacity of the
individual to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to deal
effectively with his environment (Wechsler, 1958, p. 7). As early as
1940 Wechsler referred to non-intellective as well as
intellective elements (Wechsler, 1940), by which he meant
affective, personal, and social factors. Furthermore, as early
as 1943 Wechsler was proposing that the non-intellective abilities
are essential for predicting ones ability to succeed in life.
-
Howard Gardner
began to write about multiple intelligence in 1983, when he
proposed that intrapersonal and interpersonal intelligences are as
important as the type of intelligence typically measured by IQ and
related tests.
-
Salovey and
Mayer actually coined the term emotional intelligence in
1990. They described emotional intelligence as "a form of
social intelligence that involves the ability to monitor ones own
and others feelings and emotions, to discriminate among them, and to
use this information to guide ones thinking and action" (Salovey
& Mayer, 1990). Salovey and Mayer also initiated a research program
intended to develop valid measures of emotional intelligence and to
explore its significance.
Granted that
cognitive ability seems to play a rather limited role in accounting for
why some people are more successful than others, in doing the research
for his first book, Daniel Goleman becoming aware of Salovey and
Mayers work in the early 1990s, trained as a psychologist at Harvard
where he worked with David McClelland, wrote the popular bestseller "Emotional
Intelligence" (1995), in which he offered the first ' proof'
that emotional and social factors are important.
The Five (Four)
Domains of Emotional Intelligence
Goleman in 1995
agrees with Salovey's Five Main Domains of Emotional Intelligence
(p. 43)
-
Knowing one's
emotions (self-awareness - recognizing a feeling as it happens)
-
Managing
emotions (the ability of handling feelings so they are
appropriate)
-
Motivating
oneself (marshalling emotions in the service of a goal)
-
Recognizing
emotions in others (empathy, social awareness)
-
Handling
relationships (skill in managing emotions in others)
|
|
More recently, Goleman favors only Four Domains of Emotional Intelligence (with
19 categories, as described in
his 2002-book "Primal Leadership")(2
extra categories added by the Hay Group):
-
Self-awareness (Emotional Self-Awareness, Accurate
Self-Assessment and Self Confidence)
-
Self-management
(Emotional Self-Control, Transparency
(Trustworthiness),
Adaptability, Achievement Orientation, Initiative, Optimism,
Conscientiousness)
-
Social
awareness (Empathy, Organizational Awareness, Service
Orientation)
-
Relationship
management (Inspirational Leadership,
Influence, Developing Others, Change Catalyst, Conflict
Management, Building Bonds, Teamwork and Collaboration,
Communication)
An important thing to
understand is that -at least according to Goleman - these EI
competencies are not innate talents, but learned abilities.
IQ or EI?
According to some
scientists, IQ by itself is NOT a very good predictor of job
performance. Hunter and Hunter (1984) estimated that at best IQ accounts
for about 25 percent of the variance. Sternberg (1996) has pointed out
that studies vary and that 10 percent may be a more realistic estimate.
In some studies, IQ accounts for as little as 4 percent of the variance.
In a recent meta-analysis examining the correlation and predictive
validity of EI when compared to IQ or general mental ability, Van Rooy
and Viswesvaran (2004) found IQ to be a better predictor of work and
academic performance than EI. However, when it comes to the question of
whether a person will become a “star performer” (in the top ten percent,
however such performance is appropriately assessed) within that role, or
be an outstanding leader, IQ may be a less powerful predictor than
emotional intelligence (Goleman 1998, 2001, 2002).
IQ
and EI: pure types
According to Goleman,
IQ and EI are not opposing competencies, but rather separate ones.
People with a high IQ but low EI (or the opposite) are, despite the
stereotypes, relatively rare. There is a correlation between IQ and some
aspects of EI. The stereotypes (pure types) are:
-
(Pure) High-IQ
male is typified - no surprise - by a wide range of intellectual
interest and abilities. He is ambitious and productive, predictable
and dogged, and untroubled by concerns about himself. He also tends
to be critical and condescending, fastidious and inhibited, uneasy
with sexuality and sensual experience, unexpressive and detached,
and emotionally bland and cold.
-
(Pure) High-EI
male is socially poised, outgoing and cheerful, not prone to
fearfulness or worried rumination. He has a notable capacity for
commitment to people or causes, for taking responsibility, and for
having an ethical outlook; he is sympathetic and caring in his
relationships. His emotional life is rich, but appropriate; he is
comfortable with himself, others, and the social universe he lives
in.
-
(Pure) High-IQ
female has the expected intellectual confidence, is fluent in
expressing her thoughts, values intellectual matters, and has a wide
range of intellectual and aesthetic interests. She tends to be
introspective, prone to anxiety, rumination, and guilt, and
hesitates to express her anger openly.
-
(Pure) High-EI
female tend to be assertive and expresses her feelings directly,
and feels positive about herself; life holds meaning for her. She is
outgoing and gregarious, and expresses her feelings appropriately;
she adapts well to stress. Her social poise lets her easily reach
out to new people; she is comfortable enough with herself to be
playful, spontaneous, and open to sensual experience. She rarely
feels guilty, or sinks into rumination.
How can we assess and measure
Emotional Intelligence?
Instruments
used for measuring Emotional Intelligence include:
-
EQ-I
(Bar-On, 1997): a self-report instrument to assess those
personal qualities that enabled some people to possess better
emotional well-being than others.
-
Multifactor
Emotional Intelligence Scale (Mayer, Caruso, & Salovey, 1998):
a test of ability where the test-taker performs a series of tasks
that are designed to assess the persons ability to perceive,
identify, understand, and work with emotion.
-
Emotional
Competence Inventory (ECI) (Goleman, 1998): a 360 degree
instrument, where people evaluate either the individuals
within an organization (Individual Feedback Reports) or the
organization as a whole (Work Force Audits). These audits can
provide an organizational profile for any size group within the
company. The Emotional
Competence Inventory works with the 19/21 competencies that Goleman's research suggests
which are linked to
emotional intelligence (See above under Four Domains of EI).
Book: Daniel Goleman - Emotional Intelligence - 
Compare with Emotional Intelligence: Cultural
Intelligence |
Leadership Styles |
Framing | ERG
Theory |
Path-Goal Theory |
4 Dimensions
of Relational Work
|
Competing Values Framework | Hierarchy of Needs |
Six Change Approaches
| Seven Habits
| PAEI
More management models
|
|